<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>greenerati.com &#187; LEED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenerati.com/tag/leed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenerati.com</link>
	<description>Green Building and Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CCSF Joint Use Facility To Go Platinum LEED</title>
		<link>http://greenerati.com/2010/06/21/ccsf-joint-use-facility-to-go-platinum-leed/</link>
		<comments>http://greenerati.com/2010/06/21/ccsf-joint-use-facility-to-go-platinum-leed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pepeflaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programs and Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED-NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natual ventilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiant flooring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco City College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenerati.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We thought that the whole college system was broke, so where the heck will the get the green to build this sustainability built joint use building on the rapidly improving CCSF campus? Maybe they will have giant vegan cookie sale over the next few years.
It’s not that we aren’t ecstatic to see the campus using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-350" title="ccsf-joint-use_ext" src="http://greenerati.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ccsf-joint-use_ext.jpg" alt="ccsf-joint-use_ext" width="385" height="279" />We thought that the whole college system was broke, so where the heck will the get the green to build this sustainability built joint use building on the rapidly improving <a href="http://www.ccsf.edu/NEW/en.html">CCSF</a> campus? Maybe they will have giant vegan cookie sale over the next few years.</p>
<p>It’s not that we aren’t ecstatic to see the campus using sustainable deign practices be having architect <a href="http://www.pfaulong.com/about-us/people/peter-pfau">Peter Pfau</a> shoot for a <a href="http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=222">LEED Platinum</a> rating. Some of the sustainable elements will include natural ventilation, a green roof, radiant flooring, a geothermal central plant, abundant daylight, durable and easy to maintain materials, well designed shading for west-facing façade, and post consumer/green materials. Notice the lack of big-ticket items? Just because a building shoots for a LEED Platinum rating doesn’t mean that the budget needs to unsustainable.</p>
<p>When the new three story facility opens we’re sure that the students and facility will be give the building high marks for indoor air quality and the overall healthy study conditions.  It makes us want to go back to school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenerati.com/2010/06/21/ccsf-joint-use-facility-to-go-platinum-leed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green and Greenwashing at PCBC 2009</title>
		<link>http://greenerati.com/2009/06/19/green-and-greenwashing-at-pcbc-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://greenerati.com/2009/06/19/green-and-greenwashing-at-pcbc-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pepeflaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programs and Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castor oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Icynene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscone Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spray foam insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Forestry Initiative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenerati.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn’t exactly a quite hush that settled over the San Francisco’s Moscone Center for the 50th PCBC convention but the crowds and exhibitors for this annual builders convention came in about one-half of last year. Nonetheless, in this era of minimalism and slimming down the show offered an array of notable speakers and some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/files/2009/06/pcbc-2009.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1168" src="http://greenbuildingelements.com/files/2009/06/pcbc-2009.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="374" /></a>It wasn’t exactly a quite hush that settled over the San Francisco’s Moscone Center for the 50th <a href="http://www.pcbc.com/">PCBC</a> convention but the crowds and exhibitors for this annual builders convention came in about one-half of last year. Nonetheless, in this era of minimalism and slimming down the show offered an array of notable speakers and some innovative products. Now of course, with the slogan “The New Age of Innovation” we hoped for more progressive Green products and not just in a marketing sense.</p>
<p><span id="more-15"></span></p>
<p>On the creatively intriguing side, we walked into the <a href="http://www.icynene.com/">Icynene Inc.</a> display booth only knowing that they create their Icynene LD-R-50 spray foam insulation partially from<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castor_oil"> Castor oil</a>. Honestly, we didn’t exactly know the origin of Castor oil. Castor oil comes from Castor beans (not true beans from Castor plant) and don’t serve a normal food source, so not food for insulation here. Castor crops don’t require pesticides or fungicides or even water to grow and are rapidly renewable. For this insulation, they use <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">15</span> eight percent castor oil (and unfortunately <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">85</span> 92 percent <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/polyglycol">polyglycol</a>, which in our eyes is like using <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">B15</span> B8 biodiesel. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Fifteen</span> Eight percent is better than zero percent but still a long way to go. This product helps eliminate dust, pollen and contains no VOCs as it is water blown. Most traditional cellulose insulation comes from 80% newspaper (up to100% post-consumer recycled) and 20% binders and fire-retardants, commonly borax, boric acid, sulfuric acid, ammonium sulfates and/or other chemical compounds. Smell the goodness.</p>
<p>One of the most disappointing aspects of PCBC would be the continual greenwashing that some organizations and companies wish to convey to the public and trade. The <a href="http://www.sfiprogram.org/">SFI</a> (Sustainable Forestry Initiative) had booth and lots of literature about how they which on the surface seems on the track to be doing the right thing with their Green certification but if you check below the tree cover it might not seem so verdant.</p>
<p>Most Green people would be disillusioned with the fact that SFI finds its roots firmly planted with the lumber companies which of course offers no value. Then they somewhat cleaned up their legitimacy a few years ago by creating third party certification, publicly available standards and a more transparent process.</p>
<p>We met the Director of Green Building for SFI at the PCBC booth where he did the hard sell offering such info that they continue to push the <a href="http://www.usgbc.org/">USGBC</a> to include SFI certified wood in the LEED standard. To us, it seems like a lot of lobbying and less to do with the legitimacy of the certification.</p>
<p>When it comes down to it, the SFI wants people to think that they reign superior or even equal to <a href="http://www.fsc.org/">FSC</a> certification but take a look at some of the comparisons where SFI allows:</p>
<p>-use of genetically modified trees</p>
<p>- logging close to rivers and streams that harms water supplies</p>
<p>-use of toxic chemicals while FSC does not allow these in the forests.</p>
<p>And we can go on and on but as they say a picture is worth a thousand words so check out the SFI versus FSC forest land photo courtesy of <a href="http://heartofgreen.typepad.com/heart_of_green/2008/05/fsc-vs-sfi.html">heartofgreen</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/files/2009/06/heart-of-green1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1167" src="http://greenbuildingelements.com/files/2009/06/heart-of-green1.jpg" alt="" width="497" height="340" /></a></p>
<p>‘nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenerati.com/2009/06/19/green-and-greenwashing-at-pcbc-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Fran’s Orchard Hotel Nabs LEED-EB Certification</title>
		<link>http://greenerati.com/2009/04/17/san-fran%e2%80%99s-orchard-hotel-nabs-leed-eb-certification/</link>
		<comments>http://greenerati.com/2009/04/17/san-fran%e2%80%99s-orchard-hotel-nabs-leed-eb-certification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pepeflaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bed_bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california_farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate_control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy_star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest_stewardship_council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garden_hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green_building_materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini_bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night_guests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orchard_garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orchard_hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic_produce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san_fran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scorecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sister_property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vignette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenerati.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it works for one San Fran hotel then it must work for another. No, we’re not talking about more upscale mini bar items but Greening a hotel. In this case, the Orchard Garden Hotel’s (which garnered LEED-NC certification) sister property the Orchard Hotel just nabbed LEED-EB certification.
The Orchard represents San Francisco’s only hotel to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-62" title="Orchard Guestroom" src="http://greenerati.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Orchard-Guestroom.jpg" alt="Orchard Guestroom" width="287" height="165" />If it works for one San Fran hotel then it must work for another. No, we’re not talking about more upscale mini bar items but Greening a hotel. In this case, the <a href="http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/09/14/ecotraveler-san-franciscos-orchard-garden-hotel/">Orchard Garden Hotel</a>’s (which garnered LEED-NC certification) sister property the <a href="http://www.theorchardhotel.com/">Orchard Hotel</a> just nabbed <a href="http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=221">LEED-EB</a> certification.</p>
<p>The Orchard represents San Francisco’s only hotel to earn this honor, the Orchard Hotel is the second hotel in California and fourth hotel in the world with this certification. The inspiration from these green hotels comes from its 85-year-old owner, Mrs. S.C. Huang, who has pushed her environmental agenda and created more environmentally safe and sustainable hotels after the untimely cancer-related deaths of three family members.</p>
<p><span id="more-61"></span></p>
<p>We know that points don’t represent everything but for those strictly into the numbers the hotel achieved 35 out of a possible 36 points on the LEED-EB scorecard.</p>
<p>Those not familiar with LEED-EB shouldn’t expect alt energy (but it would be nice), large scale green building materials (foundations, roofs, etc) and other large ticket green building attributes. Here the sustainable aspects come more in the form of interior and service. We like the fact that the hotel is Energy Star rated and 90% more energy efficient than comparable hotels. It also contains a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_heat_exchanger">plate and frame heat exchanger</a> installed on the rooftop which decreases power needed for climate control and cooling.</p>
<p>At night, guests can sleep (or whatever they else they do in bed) better knowing that the mattress covers are made from organic and naturally anti-microbial fibers, and the wood in guest room bed bases comes from Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified sustainably harvested forests.</p>
<p>The hotel even took over the formerly Vignette restaurant (now christened Daffodil) and changed the menu to consist of mostly local ingredients and organic produce and meats from small California farms however we have yet to dig our forks into the new fare so we’ll have to see about that Green aspect later. After all, fares fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenerati.com/2009/04/17/san-fran%e2%80%99s-orchard-hotel-nabs-leed-eb-certification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>555 Mission and the Green memo</title>
		<link>http://greenerati.com/2007/12/21/555-mission-and-the-green-memo/</link>
		<comments>http://greenerati.com/2007/12/21/555-mission-and-the-green-memo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pepeflaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programs and Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[555_Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial_first_cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San_Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South_Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tishman_Speyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenerati.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time we hear talk about builders and developers saying that they can’t or won’t build Green because of “initial first cost” and Green buildings being “more expensive” to build (incorrect) but we’re glad to see what going on with 555 Mission Street. Apparently there were many Green naysayers in the Tishman-Speyer company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-134" title="555missionoctober" src="http://greenerati.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/555missionoctober.JPG" alt="555missionoctober" width="364" height="497" />From time to time we hear talk about builders and developers saying that they can’t or won’t build Green because of “initial first cost” and Green buildings being “more expensive” to build (incorrect) but we’re glad to see what going on with <a href="http://www.555missionst.com/">555 Mission Street</a>. Apparently there were many Green naysayers in the <a href="http://www.tishmanspeyer.com/">Tishman-Speyer</a> company saying that they couldn’t build 555 Green because of the costs and time constraints. A little green sparrow also chirped that the head of Tishman-Speyer sent out a companywide memo saying that he wanted all of their buildings to be at least LEED certified. He asked that any memos saying why Green building couldn’t be done be sent to his office. Know what? He didn’t get any memos back. And surprise, surprise look what can be accomplished when a Green memo comes from the top. Now, 555 is registered for LEED. Now we’re not sure about what level their aiming for but the space looks promising.<span id="more-132"></span></p>
<p>In addition to the great views that most people would ooh and ah about, what gets our green genes going are some of the less sexy LEED elements. Instead of subjecting occupants to dingy indoor views and lighting, the architects designed architectural curtain wall to enable direct views of the outdoor environment for 90% of the building’s occupants. We also like the fact that they used recycled materials for at least 10% of the material construction. The vast majority of the recycled content comes from the building structural steel and in the aluminum curtain wall, not recycled materials used inside the building. Way up high in the sky, the roof will be a highly reflective, lightly colored ‘cool roof’ system that will reduce the affect of urban heat islands. Although the “cool roof” is cool, we’d like to see an actual <a href="http://www.greenroofs.com/">Green Living Roof</a> up top but we can’t have it all.</p>
<p>With several other Green elements on tap we’re actually looking forward to seeing something attractive and Green hit the <a href="http://southbeachmissionbay.com/">South Beach</a>/Soma area. Memo to Tishman – Speyer execs: “Keep sending out those Green building memos.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenerati.com/2007/12/21/555-mission-and-the-green-memo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
